Media for Peace #4 Interkulturelle Perspektiven im Journalismus
Shownotes
In dieser Folge berichtet der Media for Peace Fellow Ali Mousavi Nizhad über seine Erfahrungen in Afghanistan als Developer. Außerdem erklärt er, warum es essentiell ist, der Bevölkerung in Kriegs- und Krisengebieten eine öffentliche Stimme durch Journalismus zu geben. Zudem verrät Innovationscoach Masiar Nashat warum die Stärke des Media for Peace Teams in der Diversität liegt und warum genau diese zu wichtigen Innovationen führt.
00:25 Kollaboration im Media for Peace Projekt 01:00 Idea Button im öffentlichen Raum 01:25 Fellow Ali Nizhad stellt sich vor 02:22 Von Afghanistan nach Deutschland 03:07 Ein Developer für den Journalismus 04:05 News Avoidance im Kriegsgebiet 05:47 Was braucht ein Land wie Afghanistan im journalistischen Kontext? 07:25 Dialoge durch einen Idea Button ermöglichen 09:40 Umgang mit Falschmeldungen und Hate Speach 11:17 Beteiligung von Audiences 12:03 Die Wichtigkeit von Dialogen beim Ansatz des peace-oriented journalism 12:35 Gefahren für öffentliche, politische Meinungen in Afghanistan 13:50 Der Impact von öffentlicher Meinung am Beispiel Zugang zu Bildung für Mädchen 15:16 Diversität im Programm Media for Peace als Chance 17:20 Motivation 17:45 Wie klappt eine interkulturelle Zusammenarbeit 20:55 Wie kommt Innovation in die Medienbranche? 24:20 Welchen Impact hat Diversität beim Thema Innovation? 26:45 Krisenregionen und Rollenbilder 29:15 Was sind dialogfördernde Formate im Journalismus?
**Weitere Informationen zu Media for Peace: www.media-lab.de/media-for-peace ** Das ist Media for Peace. Der Podcast auf den Spuren des peace-oriented Journalismus. Eine Kooperation mit der Universität der Bundeswehr München und von DTEC.BW – Zentrum für Digitalisierungs- und Technologieforschung der Bundeswehr.
Transkript anzeigen
00:00:00: Journalismus der Frieden ermöglicht. Das ist Media for Peace, ein Podcast des Media Lab Bayern.
00:00:12: Hallo, wie geht's dir? Wie ist es dir gegangen? Ich bin Sabrina Harper und berichte für dich vom
00:00:18: Media for Peace Projekt und wir schauen gemeinsam, wie Innovation und deeskalierende Journalismus
00:00:24: zusammenfinden. Beim Media for Peace Projekt kollaborieren wir ja international. Fellows aus
00:00:30: Afghanistan, dem lieber non-Südamerika und Deutschland arbeiten gemeinsam an einem Produkt,
00:00:35: das einen friedensförrenden Journalismus stärkt. Die Fellows hatte ich euch ja in Folge 1 schon
00:00:41: kurz vorgestellt und heute habe ich einen davon, nämlich Ali Musafi aus Afghanistan zum Interview
00:00:47: da. Ali hat seine Kindheit in Afghanistan verbracht und ist dort aufgewachsen. 2021 wanderte
00:00:54: er nach Pakistan aus und nun ist er für ein paar Monate in München. Eine Sache, an der er aktuell
00:01:01: arbeitet, gemeinsam mit drei weiteren Fellows, ist der sogenannte "Idea Button". Das sind Knöpfe,
00:01:07: die im öffentlichen Raum angebracht werden, um die schweigende Mehrheit zu mehr Partizipation zu
00:01:13: befähigen, also dass auch die ihre Meinung sagen. Erst dachte ich, wie soll das denn in einem Land wie
00:01:19: Afghanistan funktionieren? Was hat das für einen Mehrwert? Doch Ali hat mich eines Besseren belehrt.
00:01:25: Media for Peace - Insights
00:01:28: Hallo Ali, welcome to the podcast for Media for Peace. You are a fellow of that project and you
00:01:35: are working on it for a couple of weeks now. You are originally from Afghanistan, but you are in
00:01:42: Munich for a couple of months now. So how long are you going to stay here? I hope longer. But first,
00:01:50: hey Sabrina, thank you for having me here. After I enrolled in the fellowship programme, I asked the
00:01:58: programme manager and people in charge to send me some invitation to play for some visa. I moved
00:02:05: from Pakistan to Munich less than one month ago. Now I'm here. But originally you're from Afghanistan,
00:02:13: maybe you can give us a little look inside how living in Afghanistan is right now. I raised in
00:02:21: Afghanistan, I educated there from elementary school until the end of my master's degree. I started a
00:02:29: job as a university lecturer, a computer science lecturer there. I spent about 20 plus years of my life there.
00:02:36: After the situation changed, I decided to bring a change into my life. Maybe I should think
00:02:46: bigger with a bigger vision. When I moved to Pakistan, I left my job, I resigned from my job and I put
00:02:52: all my attitude and vision to Germany to find a job or any kind of programme that I can enroll myself to
00:03:00: that programme and use that opportunity to visit Germany. So und das ist where media for peace comes
00:03:07: in? Yeah, it's interesting for me that I applied for the last hours, maybe two or three hours until
00:03:14: the deadline. The person that sent me the link, hey, this is a programme if you want to apply,
00:03:20: you are a tick person, so they need a developer there if you are interested in.
00:03:25: And then suddenly I realised, okay, I studied computer science and I was a lot busy with giving
00:03:32: advices on systems, on architectural design of software systems. Okay, what if I can use my
00:03:40: technical knowledge in a programme that can be more beneficial to people, especially for people in need,
00:03:48: like in Afghanistan. Es ist besonders, wenn ich das Programm gehört habe, die auf
00:03:54: Konflikten fokussiert, wie Afghanistan und Lebanon. Ich war sehr motiviert.
00:04:00: Du hast für die Media for Peace geschehen, du bist jetzt Teil der Teamfamilien. Es sind
00:04:05: ca. 11 Menschen. Du hast eine Lösung für die Unterstützung von dem peace-promotenden Journalismus.
00:04:15: So, hast du ever had some kind of touch points before with journalism at all?
00:04:22: As a person who raised in a country of war and conflict, in that kind of country every single
00:04:28: citizen is kind of a journalist, but I didn't think of that from a technical perspective.
00:04:33: At the end, for example, a couple of years ago, I started listening to news or watching the news on
00:04:41: TV because I was totally bombarded by all the bad news and everything like that.
00:04:49: So, I hated somehow the news. So, when I heard about the peace-promoting journalism,
00:04:56: actually it was a really new idea for me and it was a really new concept for me to
00:05:02: explore more into this field. So, it was a new, you know, it opened a new window of exploration
00:05:11: for me to go into, especially a different background that I had. For example, I told you that I am from
00:05:18: a technical background like computer science and this is going to be a peace-promoting platform.
00:05:25: So, in that moment something just flashed in my mind that, okay, you are going to have some fun
00:05:33: things to do in this program, as well as you are there as an efficient guy. So, yeah, that was the
00:05:42: time that I really decided to participate in the program. I know you're still developing about
00:05:48: some stuff. What's it going to be? Because you never know at the beginning if you go for
00:05:53: innovation, but for you who has lived in Afghanistan, what is really important for the people over there to
00:06:03: to have? Is it like more like a security aspect? I can imagine how journalists are working over there.
00:06:12: What are you thinking about if you think about some peace-promoting stuff in an Afghanistan situation?
00:06:20: I think it would be really helpful in a country which is really struggling through problems right now.
00:06:29: It would be really helpful to, we can provide a tool or a platform or a stage for those people
00:06:38: to share their voices without being feared or without being threatened by people,
00:06:45: but in a constructive way, not in an aggressive or offensive way. So, that's the thing that we are
00:06:53: focusing on right now, while we are developing the different prototypes and we are considering those
00:07:00: features to have in such kind of platforms. I think that's a really important and efficient
00:07:07: tool for people like in Afghanistan, especially for the younger generation,
00:07:12: which really are hustling to talk to the other people around the world, to share the facts that's
00:07:19: what is happening or to resolve any conflict by conversation. I know that right now you are
00:07:28: thinking about like a button in public, where people can talk their opinions or their thoughts
00:07:37: in it to some kind of topic. So, maybe you can give us an idea what this is about.
00:07:45: It's a cool idea, I think, to bring quick, accessible and usable tool for those who want to
00:07:54: make dialogues and conversation. And actually right now we are working on some basic stuff,
00:08:03: but we hope that we can advance it to the next level. But first we have to be sure that
00:08:11: this idea is going to work. We have to take care of different aspects and after that we should
00:08:18: provide the tools to people. The idea is to give the stage or give the microphone to everyone who
00:08:24: wants to talk, who wants to share idea or opinion about a specific or a trending topic,
00:08:32: especially in a conflict zone. If I can give you a vision or an illustration of the tool,
00:08:39: it's going to be, for example, you are waiting to cross the street, okay, in front of a red light
00:08:47: or you are waiting to cross that street or I don't know, you are in the supermarket,
00:08:53: you are waiting in the line to pay for your grocery stuff. And you see a button that's with some
00:09:00: proposed title or trending topics that you are interested to talk about. So you just press
00:09:08: the button and you share your idea about it. And then if you want to have more engagement
00:09:15: onto that topic, maybe then you can install some apps to access to those other opinions by other
00:09:24: people or journalists can use these recordings to create some journalistic pieces or the podcast
00:09:33: link. We are doing right now and share it to other people. So if I think about social media
00:09:40: like Twitter or something, you write it down, but there's a lot of hate speech and stuff. So
00:09:47: if I think about Lebanon, for example, where there are those different types of groups when it
00:09:54: comes to political parties and stuff. And if I just push that button and say I don't like this
00:10:00: party or this party sucks or I just gave some fake information in there, what to do about that
00:10:07: point? Have you already considered what to do? This kind of negative thought and as you said,
00:10:14: hate speech is of course we have thought about it a lot to how we can prevent that kind of
00:10:21: negativity in such kind of platforms. For example, we thought, okay, how about if we can
00:10:29: implement artificial intelligence or AI to recognize such kind of hate speech and then
00:10:36: automatically stop those opinions from being stored into the database. Or maybe we can involve
00:10:45: some moderators or people to listen to those things or filter those hate speech and negative
00:10:53: thoughts and just delete it from the system to not be insured to the public. Because this is a
00:11:01: platform or a tool that can be used by anybody, for example, maybe over 16 or 18 years old until
00:11:08: the age range that we can imagine. So it's a public thing. Of course you have to consider it.
00:11:14: I don't want to be that detailed because it's an idea right now that you are prototyping and
00:11:21: bottom line is to get people into dialogues. Yes. Is this right? We are trying to provide a format
00:11:29: for a dialogue to make more engagement, to make more participation from people and to give them
00:11:39: the stage to talk about things, especially for those silent majority, which are somehow hindered
00:11:46: by different aspects in the community that they don't want to talk about topics or anything.
00:11:53: So we kind of trying to influence this normal conversation and normal dialogue between people
00:12:01: to talk about things. Why is dialogue so important for that context, peace-oriented journalism?
00:12:10: If you want to have a constructive community, so you have to have the pupil's opinion in that.
00:12:16: It means you cannot govern or you cannot rule a society without hearing about the society or
00:12:24: without receiving feedback about it, especially for younger generation, because they have to share
00:12:32: their opinion. Both sides have to listen, but if I think about I'm a woman and if I would be in
00:12:39: Afghanistan and I would push some kind of button to give an opinion and I would say girls need to go
00:12:46: to school. That could bring me in a really bad situation right now at the moment. So I'm thinking
00:12:58: about how to deal with such a situation. People are going to talk about a topic that is automatically
00:13:07: maybe generated by the system or specified by some journalists or somebody else. But the thing is,
00:13:15: those topics have to be more concentrated in a constructive way, not in an aggressive way.
00:13:22: Okay, yes, of course girls in Afghanistan have the right or must go to school, but there should be
00:13:29: a way to convince the government. And what is the best way to do that? The best way for me is to go
00:13:37: not in a political way. We should go for maybe in a fubens way. Let the girls speak. Let them
00:13:47: share the pain in the future. For example, if you are not allowing girls to go to school right now,
00:13:54: maybe in the next 10 years there is no educated woman in that country, especially in the medical
00:14:02: side. For example, there is no doctors in the next 10 years. And in a country, in an Islamic
00:14:09: country like Afghanistan, which men don't like to a man or a male doctor visit their woman,
00:14:17: so what would be the situation in the next 10 years? These kind of things have to be shared
00:14:23: with governments and with other people to change their mind about it. It's not right now that the
00:14:31: education is banned from girls just by the government. Okay, maybe some people in some
00:14:38: districts of Afghanistan also don't like to send their girls to school or university. But these
00:14:45: kind of states or these kind of platforms can bring this opportunity for people to listen to
00:14:53: those opinions and ideas and dialogues to change their mind in a constructive way. And then
00:15:01: after changing their mind and after visioning the future, so maybe their mind would be changed
00:15:08: and then everything would be fine. Okay, that makes sense to me. Thank you very much for that.
00:15:15: So in the media for peace context, there are a lot of different people from different parts of the
00:15:23: world having like a different kind of culture and different backgrounds like you are a developer,
00:15:31: there are some journalists, there is a UX/UI designer. How was it for you to be part of such a
00:15:40: diverse team so far? That's a great question. Maybe first I talk with myself, okay,
00:15:46: you are a developer so you have to be surrounded by developers. But also I thought, okay, what if
00:15:53: I couldn't make the chemistry with these other people from different countries with
00:16:00: different backgrounds. But I used this point as a challenge to tackle, to try to be merged
00:16:11: with these people, to share ideas and to receive feedback. Because it's really great. As a developer,
00:16:19: yes, I am okay with working on technical stuff. But maybe somebody who has mastered social skills
00:16:28: or communication skills, I can learn from him or her too. Or from a journalist from another part
00:16:36: Wir haben einen Journalist aus Kolumbia.
00:16:39: und es ist sehr wichtig, dass ich ein Tor und ein Vieles mehr bedeutet,
00:16:46: sharing a lot of interesting topic about country and she is sharing their experience through
00:16:45: the program. I think this diversity is the most exciting thing for me to experience.
00:16:53: So you have grown a lot from it?
00:16:57: Of course. I learned lots of stuff, especially from coaches, from colleagues, from everybody
00:17:06: and also from colleagues that are right now in Media Lab that I visited from plastic.
00:17:13: Yeah, it's a great experience.
00:17:15: Thanks for coming to the show and letting us know what you are thinking and what you're
00:17:20: doing.
00:17:21: Thank you so much for having me here and I hope this show also be another way of motivating
00:17:30: other people to participate in such kind of programs and use their skills to make the
00:17:37: world a better place to live.
00:17:38: As Ali already said, the Fellows are a very diverse group and exactly here comes Masya
00:17:44: Nashat in the game. He is a coach at Media for Peace and helps the Fellows from different
00:17:49: countries with the most different expertise to find a common language. That is not so
00:17:56: easy.
00:17:57: Media for Peace is very close to it.
00:18:01: Hello Masya. Nice to have you here. You are a coach at Media for Peace and helps the
00:18:08: Fellows to make their dream of a product that is inspiring to the people of the
00:18:14: world. You have accompanied the Fellows from the beginning. That means when they were
00:18:19: introduced and they are from Afghanistan, Lebanon, Germany and South America. And
00:18:27: of course it is a great challenge that everything comes together, goes together and you work
00:18:33: on a subject. You have different possibilities to bring something together. How did you
00:18:40: manage to bring the people, geographically, apart from each other, maybe culturally in
00:18:45: some ways, together?
00:18:48: Yes, first of all, thank you very much for being here and for sharing a little bit of
00:18:52: my perspective. You said, how did you manage to do that? I also ask myself the question
00:18:59: if I managed to do it. No, basically it is totally nice to work with people who
00:19:05: look at a topic with so many different perspectives, like that of peace and
00:19:11: nationalism and who then have such a topic that should and must have such a high
00:19:18: point of view in the present time. Their ideas, their backgrounds, their perspectives
00:19:26: and to get that on a speaker work together. And it's a lot of fun in the work with
00:19:33: the Fellows because not only is it a very constructive, a very productive
00:19:41: work together, but you also notice how they learn from each other and how these
00:19:49: different perspectives then lead to the fact that maybe such small inconsistencies
00:19:56: on the one hand are then improved again by the perspective of one of the other
00:20:03: Fellows or another fellow who is involved in the program. Seeing that makes a lot of
00:20:08: fun and I support where I can, on the one hand, take a look at the team,
00:20:15: who takes on what role, but also what cultural backgrounds meet there.
00:20:22: Of course, there are aspects that are always new. So today it was about the topic
00:20:30: how then also announcements within a team can work between the different
00:20:36: participants. And that's a super exciting topic because there are a lot of these
00:20:42: different cultural aspects to meet and to moderate and facilitate. It's not
00:20:47: so easy, but it's a lot of fun. I think that and another point that I haven't
00:20:52: seen yet is the Fellows from different areas. We have now heard a few
00:20:58: episodes, for example, Evalda Doreen, she is a UX/UI designer or a journalist in
00:21:04: Julia who was born in Germany and now lives in Lebanon. Or we have Eli, who is
00:21:11: more from the field of marketing and art director, who comes from the field of marketing.
00:21:17: These are also quite different areas that come together and it's not just
00:21:20: family for pizza, but also in the media industry here in Germany and all over the world.
00:21:25: Meet different actors and actors, also together. That's also a topic that
00:21:30: has a lot to do with innovation. And you are an innovation coach.
00:21:34: Maybe we'll start at the beginning and I'm going to ask you, in general,
00:21:39: how does innovation come into the media industry?
00:21:42: That's a very good question. And I just share my perspective.
00:21:49: Of course, I haven't learned innovation as such, but I'm more into it.
00:21:55: But my background is more that I look at a social scientific perspective
00:22:03: on innovation and then from a pedagogical didactic.
00:22:06: What is always coming up with the topic of innovation is that in the end it is about
00:22:12: getting to know each other with a new topic and then having the courage to
00:22:20: get to know each other, that you might not be an expert on this topic and
00:22:25: don't have much confidence, almost experience, and still overcome this topic.
00:22:36: That's a learning process and it's a self-leadership process.
00:22:39: In my work as an innovation coach and as a consultant for organizations
00:22:44: that want to take this topic, it's first of all about a space where people
00:22:51: feel safe, where they have the confidence that they can make mistakes
00:22:56: and that they can learn to do it and that they can bring their inspiration,
00:23:01: which they have somehow captured, into this organization in some way.
00:23:08: And that's for me in the end, what I'm dealing with.
00:23:11: How does innovation come about?
00:23:13: How does this trust come into the groups?
00:23:16: How does it come into collaboration between the individual participants?
00:23:21: How do you understand that making mistakes is totally part of the small tests
00:23:26: prototypes that are very, very necessary and can only really create things
00:23:33: that are long-term for the organizations used.
00:23:37: I totally agree with that.
00:23:42: I have an aversion to the word "failure culture" because that's already
00:23:46: the meaning of a culture of mistakes, but it's suitable for
00:23:50: cultural values or for the culture of attempts.
00:23:53: Or make it simple, I think "failure culture" is a misguided word.
00:24:00: It's a bit like the "crank insurance".
00:24:03: Exactly, like the "crank insurance".
00:24:05: I think "failure culture" is a very, very important factor.
00:24:13: And you have already mentioned it with experts and experts in other areas.
00:24:20: Do you think that media-for-plies is also a factor that brings the group forward
00:24:26: because they come from different areas?
00:24:29: Absolutely.
00:24:30: You can see there how interdiscipline teams can use the opposite abilities
00:24:37: perfectly and then build on each other.
00:24:40: And you have people who come from the journalistian area,
00:24:43: people who come from tech or design.
00:24:47: That, so to speak, is simply a great team, a great form of collaboration
00:24:54: because these different perspectives come together in great detail
00:24:59: and complement each other.
00:25:00: In the end, it should be a product or the aim of the fellowships
00:25:05: is to create a solution that may be in the journalist or the audiences,
00:25:15: wherever it is, helps in the crisis situation or in the prevention of crises.
00:25:22: That means that in order to create this product or solution best possible,
00:25:27: it needs a good combination of the different stakeholders
00:25:32: who act there on the spot.
00:25:36: We come to a small dilemma because often solutions are thought over
00:25:44: and then put a top-down on certain situations.
00:25:49: Of course, we have the chance to go completely different.
00:25:52: We can talk with a lot of interviews, with a lot of conversations.
00:25:57: What do journalists actually need, but also listening to crisis situations
00:26:05: that somehow consume the media?
00:26:07: What is important to them?
00:26:08: How can a solution really make a difference in their everyday life?
00:26:14: I think that diversity in the team contributes to the fact
00:26:19: that you can jump much simpler into different perspectives,
00:26:23: that you can build empathy for the different users,
00:26:28: and that something like that just arises,
00:26:31: which is more of a bottom-up,
00:26:33: where you really have set yourself apart,
00:26:35: looked in a direction together and said,
00:26:38: what would be important to you and how can a solution look like
00:26:44: that can come out of this program?
00:26:47: The whole thing is now in crisis situations with focus on Afghanistan and Lebanon.
00:26:53: In any case, it would be a blue break for other crisis areas
00:26:58: or crisis situations.
00:27:00: Can something come out of it?
00:27:03: If you look at crisis regions, of course, there are always cultural differences.
00:27:07: There are also historical differences, like the conflicts that have arisen.
00:27:12: At the same time, there are often similar roles.
00:27:18: One of these roles can be the role of a fighter,
00:27:22: a fighter, a soldier, a soldier,
00:27:25: who normally earns her bread every day in the conflict
00:27:31: that she or he is a soldier.
00:27:34: If you compare this role with different regions,
00:27:37: then it is similar in many cases.
00:27:40: There are people who get money to fight for it.
00:27:44: If you think about it, okay, we want to settle a certain conflict,
00:27:49: then you think, yes, all people are interested in peace.
00:27:53: But if you look closely at these different stakeholders,
00:27:59: who are part of the conflict party and who earn their money with it,
00:28:04: then you will quickly realize that the relationship between a soldier and a soldier
00:28:12: and the relationship between families is falling apart.
00:28:13: To believe that a soldier is now, suddenly,
00:28:17: because there is peace, a friezer is very, very short-lived.
00:28:22: That means that this user-centered approach is so important,
00:28:26: because it is also about looking at solutions
00:28:31: and how to create alternatives for the different users
00:28:37: who act in the conflict there.
00:28:41: And how can we, for example,
00:28:44: contribute to more journalistic solutions
00:28:48: that a soldier feels detached in a certain way
00:28:54: and that feeling may help a new way for my family.
00:29:00: And perhaps a simpler approach is more important.
00:29:04: And that's exactly what solutions are about,
00:29:07: which of course work for the two regions we are starting with now,
00:29:13: and then at the same time maybe even have a chance
00:29:18: to get into other areas.
00:29:21: While fellowships were being researched and there were various topics
00:29:26: that were more detailed,
00:29:28: even though we could act a bit,
00:29:31: we are now focusing on dialogue-promoted formats.
00:29:36: So formats that promote dialogue.
00:29:40: Can you give us an insight into what you can imagine?
00:29:45: I would love to.
00:29:46: Dialogue-promoting formats is a format that leads to
00:29:53: either people in a certain region or away from the region,
00:29:59: or journalists who have the chance to make dialogue
00:30:04: that leads to more understanding of each other
00:30:08: for the topics of different conflict parties.
00:30:12: And that there will be barriers that are overcome
00:30:16: that are eventually created and built
00:30:21: and built quite consciously.
00:30:26: The idea behind this selection,
00:30:29: which is now specifically focused on this topic,
00:30:33: comes from many conflicts then arise when you build up barriers.
00:30:41: When you say consciously,
00:30:43: the one party is like that, the other party is like that.
00:30:46: The one party has these values, our party has these values.
00:30:50: And there is a very, very conscious separation that leads to
00:30:55: that of course people feel belong to.
00:30:58: What a very natural need of us people is
00:31:02: that we belong to a certain group.
00:31:05: These dialogue formats or dialogue-promoting formats
00:31:08: are now about researching or finding solutions
00:31:15: to best practices that may have come together with conflict parties,
00:31:21: but also parties that are not at all related to the typical
00:31:26: conflict or peace and conflict research topic.
00:31:31: It can also be in a completely different area.
00:31:33: But where we look closely and say
00:31:36: which formats actually work when parties come together,
00:31:40: can come into a very sitting manner and can look at each other in a conversation.
00:31:45: And now it's time to see what we know,
00:31:49: which new solutions we can possibly also
00:31:52: bring with the help of new technology into the world.
00:31:56: And that's exactly where the fellows and the teams are sitting right now,
00:32:00: to look at that a little bit, to find out for yourself,
00:32:03: to see at the same time where are the chances,
00:32:06: where we might have to turn a second round
00:32:09: and do more research because we haven't yet understood enough
00:32:13: how a certain format works in a certain situation.
00:32:17: That's the job right now, that's super exciting.
00:32:20: There are a lot of different topics coming together,
00:32:22: a lot of creativity is coming into the game.
00:32:25: And that's also so nice, what we had just talked about earlier,
00:32:29: that the team is so diverse that there are many
00:32:32: different strengths and experiences brought into the team.
00:32:38: Thank you very much for your time and for your valuable input.
00:32:42: Thank you very much for your time, thank you for being here.
00:32:46: That was the fourth episode of the Media for Peace podcast
00:32:49: and the next episode will be released in two weeks.
00:32:52: We'll be back then, until then, all the best and we'll be back.
00:32:56: Media for Peace, the podcast for peaceful-oriented journalism.
00:33:02: A production of Media Lab Bayern.
00:33:05: Media for Peace is a cooperation with the DTECHBW,
00:33:09: a centre for digitalisation and technology research of the Bundeswehr
00:33:13: and the University of Bundeswehr München.
00:33:16: .
00:33:17: [BLANK_AUDIO]
Neuer Kommentar